For the offender to re-establish perceptions of his/her benevolent intent, the offender should quickly and voluntarily offer a thorough and sincere apology which conveys remorse for harm inflicted, an explanation of the details surrounding the betrayal, and a promise of future cooperation. Further, it is critical for the parties to substantively reaffirm their commitment to each other and to the ideals and values upon which the relationship is built. The offender should explicitly recommit to the relationship, and discuss strategies to avoid similar problems in the future.
This format raises the issue of the difference between training and psychotherapy and how to keep a training session from becoming a psychotherapy session. This issue has been one that has been subject to much discussion within the psychodrama community (Moreno, 1994). I have contemplated but not yet begun an article addressing the various ways a demonstration or training session can be kept from becoming psychotherapy. These include consent to the format, contract to the effect that the focus is training and not psychotherapy, and direction to the participants to choose material for the session because of its training value. In addition, the trainer and director will avoid choosing a protagonist with deep emotionally loaded issues for a session. Should such issues arise in the process of a session, the director avoids delving into them. The issues might be acknowledged in an abbreviated manner. The protagonist might be referred to a group focused on treatment.
The conclusion gives the overall verdict of the argument. You can also restate the ideas that you have discussed in the body paragraphs so as to make your point valid. The conclusion should also aim at motivating the reader to do research in the future. The conclusion is related to the argumentative introduction as the topic as well as the thesis statement is restated in a more convincing manner. The conclusion also gives you a platform of illustrating your decision concerning the argument in the article and why you have settled on that particular decision. Try not to introduce new ideas as they will give the readers an ideology that the article is not comprehensive enough.